[Source: EduTrader]Here are a few important nuances with the different time periods:
1. Much like moving averages, short measurements of HV such as 10 days move quicker and are more erratic or noisy. The advantage to using a shorter term level of HV is it can provide a quicker indication as to whether or not volatility is picking up or dropping, but it gives more false signals due to its erratic nature.
2. Longer measurements of HV such as 30 or 90 days are slower moving and less erratic. As such they provide slower indications as to whether or not volatility is picking up or dropping.
3. When you get an extended expansion or compression in volatility (i.e. the stock continues to increase or decrease in volatility), shorter term levels of HV tend to lead the longer term levels of HV. This should come as no surprise as we’ve already asserted that shorter term HV moves quicker than longer term HV.
Assessing a longer term view of any length of historical volatility (10,30,90, etc...) causes one to see that it is mean reverting. Whereas a stock could trend up indefinitely, HV typically oscillates in a range around its average. For example, between 2004 and 2007, 30 day HV on the S&P 500 Index oscillated around 11, moving as high as 16 and as low as 6 (click to enlarge).


1 comment:
Volatilty is always their.
Post a Comment